Article History
Published: Wed 22, Jan 2025
Received: Wed 04, Dec 2024
Accepted: Wed 18, Dec 2024
Author Details

Mini Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of ultrasound-guided, gene-based microwave ablation compared to surgery in managing low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. It highlights the critical role of genetic testing in tailoring treatment strategies, thereby improving patient safety and optimizing clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates and compares the efficacy and prognosis of ultrasound and gene-based microwave ablation (MWA) and surgical treatment in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), emphasizing the influence of genetic mutations on low-risk patients’ selection.
Background: MWA, a minimally invasive technique, is increasingly recognized in the management of PTC. While traditional criteria for ablation focus on tumor size, number, and location, the impact of genetic mutations on treatment efficacy remains underexplored.
Methods: A total of 201 patients with low-risk PTC without metastasis were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent ultrasound and next-generation sequencing to confirm low-risk status. Patients chose either ablation or surgery and were monitored until November 2024. Efficacy and complications were assessed using thyroid ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Results: The median follow-up of this study is 12 months. There is no significant difference between the ablation group (3.0%) and the surgery group (1.0%), in disease free survival (DFS) (P= 0.360). However, the surgery group exhibited a significantly higher complication rate, particularly for temporary hypoparathyroidism (P < 0.001). Ablation offers notable advantages, including shorter treatment duration, faster recovery, less intraoperative blood loss, and reduced costs (P < 0.001), while maintaining favorable safety and comparable efficiency.
Conclusion: For patients with low-risk genetic mutations, ablation provides comparable efficacy and DFS to surgery, with with significant benefits in safety, recovery, and overall cost. Guided by ultrasound and next-generation sequencing, precise patient selection enhances the potential of ablation as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to surgery in the management of low-risk PTC.

Keywords

Papillary thyroid carcinoma, next-generation sequencing, microwave ablation,·surgical treatment

TABLE 1. Patients characteristics.

 

Ablation

(N=100)

Surgery

(N=101)

P value

Age (year), mean (SD)

41.89 (11.13)

40.79 (10.89)

0.481

Gender (%)

 

 

0.154

Male

25 (25.0)

17 (16.8)

 

Female

75 (75.0)

84 (83.2)

 

Tumor location (%)

 

 

0.295

Left

51 (51.0)

41 (40.6)

 

Isthmus

5 (5.0)

8 (7.9)

 

Right

44 (44.0)

52 (51.5)

 

Tumor morphology (%)

 

 

0.912

Sharp margins

51 (51.0)

52 (51.5)

 

Fairly clear margins

16 (16.0)

18 (17.8)

 

Blurred margins

33 (33.0)

31 (30.7)

 

Tumor aspect ratio (%)

 

 

0.301

<1

52 (52.0)

49 (48.5)

 

=1

4 (4.0)

1 (1.0)

 

>1

44 (44.0)

51 (50.5)

 

Maximum tumor diameter (mm), mean (SD)

6.14 (2.10)

6.25 (2.11)

0.696

Tumor volume (ml), mean (SD)

0.08 (0.09)

0.08 (0.07)

0.462

UItrasound classification (%)

 

 

0.484

TI-RADS 1

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

TI-RADS 2

1 (1.0)

0 (0)

 

TI-RADS 3

1 (1.0)

2 (2.0)

 

TI-RADS 4

28 (28.0)

30 (29.7)

 

TI-RADS 5

70 (70.0)

67 (66.3)

 

TI-RADS 6

0 (0)

2 (2.0)

 

CDFI (%)

 

 

0.468

Blood flow signal within the nodule

43(43.0)

51 (50.5)

 

Peripheral ring-like blood flow signal

7 (7.0)

4 (4.0)

 

Ring-like blood flow signal within and around the nodule

14(14.0)

17 (16.8)

 

No ring-like blood flow signal within and around the nodule

36(36.0)

29 (28.7)

 

FNAB (%)

 

 

0.505

TBS-I

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

TBS-II

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

TBS-III

5(5.0)

2 (2.0)

 

TBS-IV

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

TBS-V

4(4.0)

4 (4.0)

 

TBS-VI

91(91.0)

95 (94.0)

 

Gene mutation type (%)

 

 

0.664

Single BRAF gene mutation

58(58.0)

54 (53.4)

 

BRAF gene mutation combined with other gene mutations

37(37.0)

38 (37.6)

 

Other gene mutations

2(2.0)

5 (5.0)

 

No gene mutation detected

3(3.0)

4 (4.0)

 

Follow-up time (month), mean (SD)

11.51 (5.45)

11.50 (3.12)

0.434

Disease progression (%)

 

 

0.308

Yes

3 (3.0)

1 (1.0)

 

No

97(97.0)

100 (99.0)

 

CDFI: Color Doppler Flow Imaging; FNAB: Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy; SD: Standard Deviation; TBS: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology; TI-RADS: American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System.

TABLE 2. Patients baseline between different gene mutations.

 

Single BRAF gene mutation

N=112

BRAF accompanied with other gene mutations

N=75

Non-BRAF gene mutations

N=7

No gene mutation

N=7

P-value

Age (years), mean (SD)

40.93 (11.13)

42.16 (11.00)

38.57 (12.43)

41.86 (8.53)

0.796

Gender (%)

 

 

 

 

0.479

Female

89 (79.5)

57 (76.0)

7 (100.0)

6 (85.7)

 

Male

23 (20.5)

18 (24.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (14.3)

 

Tumor location (%)

 

 

 

 

0.631

Left

54 (48.2)

31 (41.3)

4 (57.1)

3 (42.9)

 

Right

50 (44.6)

41 (54.7)

2 (28.6)

3 (42.9)

 

Isthmus

8(7.2)

3(4.0)

1(14.3)

1(14.3)

 

Tumor morphology (%)

 

 

 

 

0.410

Sharp margins

52 (46.4)

43 (57.3)

4 (57.1)

4 (57.1)

 

Fairly clear margins

24 (21.4)

10 (13.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Blurred margins

36 (32.1)

22 (33.4)

3 (42.9)

3 (42.9)

 

Tumor aspect ratio (%)

 

 

 

 

0.397

<1

57 (50.9)

36 (48.0)

6 (85.7)

2 (28.6)

 

=1

2 (1.8)

3 (4.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

>1

53 (47.3)

36 (48.0)

1 (14.3)

5 (71.4)

 

Tumor diameter (mm), mean (SD)

6.12 (2.06)

6.28 (2.13)

7.03 (2.61)

5.71 (2.21)

0.636

Tumor volume (ml), mean (SD)

0.07 (0.07)

0.09 (0.09)

0.08 (0.07)

0.07 (0.05)

0.732

TI-RADS (%)

 

 

 

 

0.213

1

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

2

0 (0.0)

1 (1.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

3

1 (0.9)

1 (1.3)

1 (14.3)

0 (0.0)

 

4

30 (26.8)

25 (33.3)

2 (28.6)

1 (14.3)

 

5

81 (72.3)

46 (61.3)

4 (57.1)

6 (85.7)

 

6

0 (0.0)

2 (2.7)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

SD: Standard Deviation; TBS: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology; TI-RADS: American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System.

TABLE 3. Disease progression between ablation and surgery groups.

 

Ablation (N=100)

Surgery (N=101)

P-value

Disease progression (%)

 

 

0.360

Cervical lymph node metastasis

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Local tumor progression

2 (2.00)

0 (0.0)

 

Tumor recurrence

1 (1.0)

1 (1.0)

 

Distant metastasis

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Recurrence location (%)

 

 

0.368

PTC-RT

1 (1.0)

0 (0.0)

 

PTC-LT

0 (0.0)

1 (1.0)

 

Local tumor progression, the tumor continues to grow within the ablation zone.

PCT: Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma; PTC-RT: PTC of the Right Lobe; PTC-LT, PTC of the Left Lobe.

TABLE 4. Complications and hospitalizations in ablation and surgery groups.

 

Ablation

(N=100)

Surgery

(N=101)

P-value

Complication (%)

 

 

<0.001

Postoperative fever

0 (0.0)

1 (1.0)

 

Postoperative cervical pain

0 (0.0)

5 (5.0)

 

Postoperative nausea

0 (0.0)

2 (2.0)

 

Temporary hypoparathyroidism

0 (0.0)

19 (18.8)

 

Postoperative hypertension

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Hemorrhage (ml), mean (SD)

0.00 (0.00)

8.72 (3.74)

<0.001

hospitalization time (d), mean (SD)

1.00 (0.00)

2.88 (0.41)

<0.001

Treatment time (h), mean (SD)

0.29 (0.04)

1.31 (0.58)

<0.001

Cost (CNY), mean (SD)

17669.73 (175.14)

35757.29 (2781.39)

<0.001

SD: Standard Deviation.

FIGURE 1: Study flow diagram.
Study flowchart of patient inclusion for the study on low-risk PTC treatments at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. A total of 400 patients who underwent ablation or surgical treatment from January 2022 to November 2024 were initially screened for the prospectively observational cohort study. Exclusions included patients with multiple lesions or tumor diameters greater than 1 cm (n=123), those without malignancy indications in fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and genetic testing (n=2), and patients with genetic testing indicating intermediate-high risk PTC (n=11). Additionally, patients with cervical lymph node metastasis (n=18) were excluded. Ultimately, 245 patients with low-risk PTC were included, with 141 opting for surgery and 104 choosing ablation. After further exclusions for incomplete data, the final groups included 101 patients in the surgery group and 100 patients in the ablation group.
FIGURE 2: Distribution of genetic mutations, demographic characteristics, and treatment types among patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.
The figure shows the frequency of genetic mutations in patients undergoing ablation and surgery, with B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase V600E (BRAF V600E) mutations being the most common.
FIGURE 3: Disease-free survival curves of ablation versus surgery.
Kaplan-Meier curve illustrating disease free survival (DFS) for patients with low-risk PTC who underwent either ablation or surgery.
FIGURE 4: Ultrasound images for patients with thyroid carcinoma before and after Microwave ablation.
A) Pre-ablation thyroid ultrasound of patient A. B) Post-ablation thyroid contrast-enhanced ultrasound of patient A. C) Pre-ablation thyroid ultrasound of patient B. D) Post-ablation thyroid contrast-enhanced ultrasound of patient B. E) Pre-ablation thyroid ultrasound of patient C. F) Post-ablation thyroid contrast-enhanced ultrasound of patient C. G) Pre-ablation thyroid ultrasound of patient D. H) Post-ablation thyroid contrast-enhanced ultrasound of Patient D.
REFERENCES

1.    Rebecca L Siegel, Angela N Giaquinto, Ahmedin Jemal Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 12-49, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

2.    Hyuna Sung, Jacques Ferlay, Rebecca L Siegel, et al. “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.” CA Cancer J Clin, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209-249, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

3.    Zubair W Baloch, Sylvia L Asa, Justine A Barletta, et al. “Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms.” Endocr Pathol, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 27-63, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

4.    Gabriella Pellegriti 1, Francesco Frasca, Concetto Regalbuto, et al. Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: update on epidemiology and risk factors. J Cancer Epidemiol, vol. 2013, pp. 965212, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

5.    Junjie Huang, Chun Ho Ngai, Yunyang Deng, et al.Incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in 50 countries: a joinpoint regression analysis of global trends. Endocrine, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 355-365, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

6.    Iwao Sugitani Active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 101630, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

7.    Laura Boucai, Mark Zafereo, Maria E Cabanillas Thyroid Cancer: A Review. JAMA, vol. 331, no. 5, pp. 425-435, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

8.    Min Joo Kim, Jae Hoon Moon, Eun Kyung Lee, et al. “Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancers: A Review of Current Practice Guidelines.” Endocrinol Metab, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 47-60, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

9.    R Michael Tuttle, Duan Li, Fourat Ridouani “Percutaneous ablation of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer.” Endocr Relat Cancer, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. e220244, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

10. Yusaku Yoshida, Kiyomi Horiuchi, Takahiro Okamoto “Patients’ view on the management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: active surveillance or surgery.” Thyroid, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 681-687, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

11. Jung Heo, Hyun Jin Ryu, Hyunju Park, et al. “Mortality rate and causes of death in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.” Endocrine, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 671-680, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

12. Mo-Han Guo, Jian-Ping Dou, Lin Zheng, et al. “Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation versus surgery for solitary T1bN0M0 PTC: a prospective multicenter study.” Eur Radiol, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 569-578, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

13. Ying Wei, Wen-Quan Niu, Zhen-Long Zhao, et al. “Microwave Ablation versus Surgical Resection for Solitary T1N0M0 PTC.” Radiology, vol. 304, no. 3, pp. 704-713, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

14. Chinese Medical Doctor Association Thyroid Tumor Ablation Therapy Expert Group, Thyroid Cancer Committee of the China Anti-Cancer Association, Ultrasound Interventional Professional Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association Interventional Physician Branch, et al. (2018). Expert Consensus on Thermal Ablation Treatment for Benign Thyroid Nodules, Microcarcinoma, and Cervical Metastatic Lymph Nodes (2018 Edition). Chinese Journal of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 768-773, 2018.

15. Mengdi Jin, Zhijun Li, Yaoyao Sun, et al. “Association analysis between the interaction of RAS family genes mutations and PTC in the Han Chinese population.” Int J Med Sci, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 441-447, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

16. Jialong Yu, Yihan Zhang, Jian Zheng, et al. “Ultrasound images-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of RET rearrangement in PTC.” Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 13, pp. 1062571, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

17. Ziheng Ye, Xiaotian Xia, Peipei Xu, et al. “The prognostic implication of the BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid cancer in a Chinese population.” Int J Endocrinol, vol. 2022, pp. 6562149, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

18. Thitima Khonrak, Sasithorn Watcharadetwittaya, Yaovalux Chamgramol, et al. “RET rearrangements are relevant to histopathologic subtypes and clinicopathological features in Thai PTC patients.” Pathol Oncol Res, vol. 29, pp. 1611138, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

19. Athanasios Bikas, Sara Ahmadi, Theodora Pappa, et al. “Additional Oncogenic Alterations in RAS-Driven Differentiated Thyroid Cancers Associate with Worse Clinicopathologic Outcomes.” Clin Cancer Res, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 2678-2685, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

20. Chinese Society of Endocrinology, et al. “Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (Second Edition).” Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 181-226, 2023.

21. Bryan R Haugen, Erik K Alexander, Keith C Bible, et al. “2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.” Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-133, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

22. Jialong Liang, Wanshi Cai, Dongdong Feng, et al. “Genetic landscape of papillary thyroid carcinoma in the Chinese population.” J Pathol, vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 215-226, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

23. Wei Guo, Junwei Huang, Taiping Shi, et al. “Genotypes of PTC With High Lateral Neck Metastasis in Chinese Population.” Front Oncol, vol. 12, pp. 816897, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

24. Giovanni Mauri, Laszlo Hegedüs, Steven Bandula, et al. “European Thyroid Association and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Minimally Invasive Treatments in Malignant Thyroid Lesions.” Eur Thyroid J, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 185-197, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

25. Lin Yan, Xinyang Li, Yingying Li, et al. “Comparison of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus thyroid lobectomy for T1bN0M0 PTC.” Eur Radiol, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 730-740, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

26. Zhen-Long Zhao, Shu-Rong Wang, Gang Dong, et al. “Microwave Ablation versus Surgical Resection for US-detected Multifocal T1N0M0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A 10-Center Study.” Radiology, vol. 311, no. 1, pp. e230459, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

27. Lin Yan, WenHui Li, YaLin Zhu, et al. “Long-term comparison of image-guided thermal ablation vs. lobectomy for solitary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.” Int J Surg, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 4867-4875, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

28. Mingbo Zhang, Ralph P Tufano, Jonathon O Russell, et al. “Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgery for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Results of Over 5 Years' Follow-Up.” Thyroid, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 408-417, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

29. Lin Yan, Zhen Yang, Yingying Li, et al. “Five-year Outcome Between Radiofrequency Ablation vs Surgery for Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.” J Clin Endocrinol Metab, vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 3230-3238, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

30. Lin Yan, Ying Liu, WenHui Li, et al. “Long-term Outcomes of Ultrasound-guided Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Solitary Low-risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.” Ann Surg, vol. 277, no. 5, pp. 846-853, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

31. Lin Zheng, Jian-Ping Dou, Zhi-Yu Han, et al. “Microwave Ablation for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma with and without US-detected Capsule Invasion: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.” Radiology, vol. 307, no. 3, pp. e220661, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

32. Julia E Noel, Sean M Wrenn “Outcomes of Thermal Ablation for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.” JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

33. Lin Yan, Yingying Li, Xin Yang Li, et al. “Clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for solitary T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: A retrospective study with more than 5 years of follow-up.” Cancer, vol. 129, no. 16, pp. 2469-2478, 2023. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

34. Maria Sharmila Alina de Sousa, Isabela Nogueira Nunes, Yasmin Paz Christiano, et al. “Genetic alterations landscape in paediatric thyroid tumours and/or differentiated thyroid cancer: Systematic review.” Rev Endocr Metab Disord, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35-51, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed

35. Rengyun Liu, Guangwu Zhu, Jie Tan, et al. “Genetic trio of BRAF and TERT alterations and rs2853669TT in papillary thyroid cancer aggressiveness.” J Natl Cancer Inst, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 694-701, 2024. View at: Publisher Site | PubMed